<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Idealism Dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/10/21/is-idealism-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/10/21/is-idealism-dead/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hayes</title>
		<link>http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/10/21/is-idealism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-4203</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/10/21/is-idealism-dead/#comment-4203</guid>
		<description>Great book - looking forward to the TALO(FLNW)2006 edition to add to the stack.

Here&#039;s hoping you can join us at the BYS06 gig.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great book &#8211; looking forward to the TALO(FLNW)2006 edition to add to the stack.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s hoping you can join us at the BYS06 gig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Kerr</title>
		<link>http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/10/21/is-idealism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3983</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/10/21/is-idealism-dead/#comment-3983</guid>
		<description>hi graham,

I followed your links and was very interested by stephen&#039;s comments and the reaction to them. I think it was good how you reflected on his follow up post and modified your attitude. 

I wouldn&#039;t know whether what stephen says is correct in this particular case but he raises some very important issues about the future of the educational blogging enterprise (web2.0-ism, if I may coin a phrase). 

&quot;Blame not the speaker but be warned by his words&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi graham,</p>
<p>I followed your links and was very interested by stephen&#8217;s comments and the reaction to them. I think it was good how you reflected on his follow up post and modified your attitude. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t know whether what stephen says is correct in this particular case but he raises some very important issues about the future of the educational blogging enterprise (web2.0-ism, if I may coin a phrase). </p>
<p>&#8220;Blame not the speaker but be warned by his words&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh Blackall</title>
		<link>http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/10/21/is-idealism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3921</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh Blackall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/10/21/is-idealism-dead/#comment-3921</guid>
		<description>Nice post G, many thanks. I certainly was very nervous. But it faded as I started getting into it more. I&#039;m pretty sure that my work won&#039;t actually instigate change, but reckon it does push ou the boundaries, and therefore gives others more room to move - and it is there that the change can happen hey. 

You know about the TALO SwapMeet in Adelaide next March?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post G, many thanks. I certainly was very nervous. But it faded as I started getting into it more. I&#8217;m pretty sure that my work won&#8217;t actually instigate change, but reckon it does push ou the boundaries, and therefore gives others more room to move &#8211; and it is there that the change can happen hey. </p>
<p>You know about the TALO SwapMeet in Adelaide next March?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Burgin</title>
		<link>http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/10/21/is-idealism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3912</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Burgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/10/21/is-idealism-dead/#comment-3912</guid>
		<description>What needs to &#039;die&#039; is traditional &#039;sit around a round table and listen to the front&#039; conference behaviour. It unwittingly takes us back to older, more passive behaviour patterns. This was the irony of last week&#039;s NSW Learnscope Conference. 

The two mornings had a fresh, informal energy about them as we raced from one 10-minute session to another. Then we listened politely when George Siemens or Nancy White spoke. George brought two good days to an end on a high...then we had to all go home! Why at least wasn&#039;t the BAR open?? Listen and learn, but we can&#039;t fund celebrating it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What needs to &#8216;die&#8217; is traditional &#8216;sit around a round table and listen to the front&#8217; conference behaviour. It unwittingly takes us back to older, more passive behaviour patterns. This was the irony of last week&#8217;s NSW Learnscope Conference. </p>
<p>The two mornings had a fresh, informal energy about them as we raced from one 10-minute session to another. Then we listened politely when George Siemens or Nancy White spoke. George brought two good days to an end on a high&#8230;then we had to all go home! Why at least wasn&#8217;t the BAR open?? Listen and learn, but we can&#8217;t fund celebrating it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud Hunt</title>
		<link>http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/10/21/is-idealism-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3837</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/10/21/is-idealism-dead/#comment-3837</guid>
		<description>Graham,

  I certainly don&#039;t think that conferences and teaching are dead, although I do understand why you (and I, and others) are questioning their value.  After these recent questions, I still say &quot;yes&quot; to conferences, both online and physical, and I still support the K12 Online model.    I&#039;m looking forward to your presentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham,</p>
<p>  I certainly don&#8217;t think that conferences and teaching are dead, although I do understand why you (and I, and others) are questioning their value.  After these recent questions, I still say &#8220;yes&#8221; to conferences, both online and physical, and I still support the K12 Online model.    I&#8217;m looking forward to your presentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
