Comments on: For What It’s Worth…

By: Chris Harbeck

Chris Harbeck — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:32:11 +0000

Nice new look Graham. Regardless the content is what we come for. It remains great.

Chris

By: Darren Draper

Darren Draper — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:18:06 +0000

I like the name and love the new look. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with being open.

By: Steve Dembo

Steve Dembo — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:33:48 +0000

Heh, I never realized that Teach42 influenced your old name. Regardless, I love the change. As others have already commented, it’s so ‘open’ to interpretation and not just from a tech standpoint either.

Making the decision to change your ‘brand’ isn’t easy, but I think you’ve made the right one!

By: John Larkin

John Larkin — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:07:07 +0000

Good one Graham. Yes, be true to yourself. Do you feel liberated?

By: Pam Thompson

Pam Thompson — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 08:05:02 +0000

An apt indicator of what, or who, you really are Graham. I like it. As Elaine says ‘open’ can be interpreted in many ways so you have plenty of scope to incorporate this into your musings

By: Jo McLeay

Jo McLeay — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:49:35 +0000

so great to read this Graham. It is risky changing blog title, but as Elaine says, you are being true to yourself.

By: Elaine Talbert

Elaine Talbert — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:10:18 +0000

I like the new title too. A lot easier to stay true to theme and self with this blog label.

The use of generational labels poses some difficulties and there is lack of consensus on meanings.

“open” can be used in so many ways not just from the latest tech. angle.

I’ll look forward to future posts that reflect your rationale for this change. Elaine

By: Sarah Stewart

Sarah Stewart — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:49:38 +0000

For what it’s worth, I really like ‘open educator’ – it has a number of meanings & should do well in a google rankings. I need to change my by-line too, but am too scared to – what if people ‘lose’ me?