I’ve just finished reading a blog post by Dean Shareski on being a more regular blogger. Knowing Dean a little bit, I actually thought it may have been about fibre and looking after your bowel. But a section of the post resonated with a gnawing disconnect that I’ve been experiencing with Twitter as forum for connection.
For others I fear twitter got in the way and now instead of meal sized portions of learning, all we’re getting is table scraps and candy.
For me, Twitter is a low hanging fruit for online thinking and learning. I cringe inwardly a little when someone pronounces Twitter as the best PD they’ve ever had. I wonder how it is that they have had such a barren run throughout their career for this to be true. Maybe because I’m not in with any particular social group but I mainly see people pointing to links of stuff that someone else created, sharing in jokes (which are out jokes to me), fawning over big name edublogger types, shout outs and #hashtag mania. To paraphrase Jerry Seinfeld, not that there’s anything wrong with all of that, but it is a far cry from sitting down over a blog post and putting your own words, thoughts and ideas out there using as many characters as you want to get the job done. I can respect any one who is prepared to do that because it does seem that some of the more vocal Twitter fans on my twitterstream are reluctant to be bloggers. Deep down, writing in depth is a commitment and a challenge that they shy away from and espousing Twitter as the premier networked learning outlet (often referred to as their PLN) looks like a diversion away from that scenario.
Here in Adelaide at a number of departmental workshops and conferences, organisers announce that the event will “be on Twitter” and educators who don’t normally engage with social media (apart from Facebook but that’s not for learning, now is it?) sign up for the day and have a go at “tweeting”. These accounts are then abandoned as they all return back to their day jobs and bursting email inboxes. And I can’t think of any pearls of wisdom from any of these events that have benefitted my learning or triggered further thinking.
But blogging is different for me. I can recall various blog posts that have turned on the virtual light bulb for me with ideas that couldn’t possibly be contained within 140 characters. From Christian Long’s Future of Learning Manifesto to Leigh Blackall’s Teaching Is Dead to Artichoke’s Calls for Gendered Group Think about Web2.0 and Claudia Ceraso’s Some thoughts on identity -particularly mine – just to name a near-handful. These posts opened up my mind to new persectives, made me reconsider what I was doing in terms of learning for myself and the staff and students with whom I work, and inspired me to strive to write for insightful and challenging purposes. I can’t do any of that in a Tweet.
About all I can manage to do in a Tweet is get people offside. My attempts at conferences to be provocative have been interpreted by others as sounding snarky and negative.
So, some people can feast reasonably well from the ground level branches of networked learning or wait for those who take the time and effort to climb that metaphorical tree of learning to drop them down a tasty morsel or two – or they can plant their own tree, watch it grow and then climb up high to where the most nutritious fruit is and trade them with others who’ve planted their virtual learning tree nearby.
OK, I’ll stop now. The metaphor is starting to get a bit stretched and thin now.
Like my efforts on Twitter.